Myself and my sister landed in Dublin airport a couple of hours ago, from Narita via Heathrow, after two weeks in Japan. On one level I’m going to miss ordering what looks like ice cream from a picture menu and getting unflavoured tofu with fish intestine; on another, whee!, understanding what the fuсk is going on is a bit of a timesaver.
(Again, thank you for the floor, Claire :-) .
My experience of moods and depression and long-term cheerfulness is that they’re predominantly products of behavioural patterns; so, to think of secondary school, if I spent lunch sitting in the sun talking whacked-out surrealism and then the afternoon physics class practising making paper aeroplanes and throwing balls of paper around the lab, three or four days a week, I was happy. If I spent the breaks standing around, coming up with sarcastic jeers and maybe listening to conversation on premiership results for some novelty, general I-hate-the-worldness set in.
On which reasoning, I should get the fuсk out of this city.
On Ashkenazim having an average IQ of 111, and why calling them more intelligent based on that (and their historical performance in Soviet chess tournaments, too) is justified;
Ar an 3ú lá de mí 5, scríobh J.
> [is the test culturally skewed?]
Yes, it is. But that’s fine, because it measures something that is culture-specific; I’m sure you’ve come across the idea that if a Melanesian islander of the nineteenth century wrote an IQ test, those that do well in IQ tests in the West would probably crash and burn. Well, the “faculty of understanding,” as the OED describes intelligence, is, empirically, judged relative to our culture—it’s only rarely that you judge someone as intelligent based on their chess playing technique, it’s much more often how they behave within the constraints of what’s appropriate in a given social situation, how they express themselves [themself? :-)] in the language that’s available.
> [IQ differences should be ascribed to differing values and education rather than raw brainpower.]
I’m tending to the view that cold hard brainpower is formed more by education, values and experience than by anything else. Mild tabula rasa , if you will :-) .
(This was private mail, so I’ve rephrased my correspondent’s commentary.)